"Type of Soap, UV Light Boost Incidence Of DLK"
by Robert M.
Kershner, MD, FACS
Tucson,
AZ – Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) is a relatively new complication of LASIK
that still confounds clinicians. Also referred to as the "sands of the
Sahara" syndrome, DLK is a diffuse sterile accumulation of interface
inflammatory cells.
Robert Kershner, MD, set
out to determine the etiology of the disorder and found the presence of
ultraviolet light and New Palmolive detergent to be culprits. Dr. Kershner, who
is in private practice in Tucson, AZ recounted how he reached that conclusion.
DLK was not an issue
when automated lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) was performed, he explained.
Today, however, DLK is a
hot topic, and with the popularity of LASIK, there is speculation about
numerous etiologies of the disorder that range from meibomian secretions to
operation room temperature changes, he said.
"Prevention
consists primarily of avoiding potential contaminants that can cause it, which
is difficult because the etiology of DLK is still unknown. The treatment has
been just as difficult," Dr. Kershner said.
In an effort to
eliminate as many possible etiologies of DLK as possible, Dr. Kershner
conducted a prospective evaluation of 682 eyes that underwent LASIK.
The procedure was
simplified such that the only things that came in contact with the study eyes
were the topical anesthetic, the microkeratome the forceps for lifting and
replacing the flap and the laser. At the end of the procedure, the eyes were
irrigated with cold BSS.
Dr. Kershner reported
that Bausch & Lombs Hansatome and the Automated Corneal Shaper
microkeratomes were used interchangeably, with no differences in the incidence
of DLK.
"The incidence
varied from 0.2% to 3%" he said. "The cases were typically clustered;
they were not limited to the first case of the day, the first eye or the
surgeon who performed the procedure.
"Only two
predisposing factors were identified: ultraviolet light, that is, either the
light from the excimer laser or sunlight, and Palmolive detergent, which was
used to clean the microkeratome," he said, "When we eliminated the
detergent the incidence of DLK decreased."
For DLK to occur there
must be both a predisposing factor and a contaminant present. Any soap or
detergent may be a factor; Surgeons and staff must be vigilant to prevent
outbreak of DLK, according to Dr. Kershner.
"LASIK surgeons
should report the incidence and possible etiologies so we than share
information about this frustrating complication, because it can be eliminated."
Dr. Kershner said.
The New Palmolive
detergent is three times as concentrated as that used when ALK was performed,
yet we have not adjusted to using only one-third as much," he said. He
questioned why surgeons are using the detergent in clean the instrument.
Avoid contact with eyes,
he warned, and if contact does occur, rinse the eyes thoroughly with water
because any exposure may cause irritation.
"Ultraviolet light,
which is not possible to eliminate, does predispose to the exposure that must be
present for DLK to occur, he concluded. "Using chilled BSS may reduce or
dilute the contaminant and prevent thermal injury. Patients should wear
ultraviolet protection postoperatively, because sunlight may be a factor as
well."
Dr. Kershner has no
proprietary interest in any aspect of this report. He recognized the
contribution of David Dulaney, MD, to the study.